Find Motorola Motonav Tn565t 4 3 Inch Bluetooth at Amazon
|
With the increasing popularity of GPS units, companies compete for being capable to invent the best device there is. As contest is tough and technology is fast changing, tracking gadgets are likewise fast bettering in terms of functionality and look. Technology experts have been keeping score when it comes to which appliances are leading in the race of being the best there is. Below are a few of the most highly ranked GPS units of 2011. 1. The Motorola Motonav TN765T This automobile tracking device has a 5.1-inch touch screen display, a keyboard input method as well as voice command. Its receiver type may accommodate 20 channels. Reviews say that this device has magnificent screen luminance and the map detail is great without being too much. Its Bluetooth sound quality has been reviewed to be splendid as well as the sensitivity of it is receiver. Majority of it is reviews has considered this as one of the most perfective GPS units. 2. The Nuvi 3790T GPS Receiver from Garmin This automobile tracking scheme has a 4.4-inch touch screen display and has 12 channels. It also has a voice command feature and is WAAS enabled for heightened accuracy. Reviews say that one of the most interesting features that this device offers is it is voice command. 3. The Nuvi 465T S Vehicle from Garmin This automobile tracking device has a 4.4-inch touch screen display; a keyboard input method and has a voice command feature. It is both WAAS and EGNOS enabled for an intensified accuracy. Reviews of the product say that it has a sharp, clear and splendid signal reception. This device will be competent to mechanically connect to a cellular phone whenever the phone is within reach of the this unit. Reviews also say that the lane assistance feature of the device helps users by guiding them towards the right line, in particular when it comes to complex interchanges in the highway. 4. The XXL 550 Car GPS Receiver from TomTom This automobile GPS device has a touch screen display and is WAAS enabled for heightened accuracy. Reviews say this device has the most immediate and smartest routing system possible. 5. The GPSMAP 78s Receiver This handheld receiver has a keypad input method and is WAAS enabled for intensified accuracy. It has a screen size of 2.7 inches. Reviews say that this device has splendid track, waypoint management and route tools. The built-in route planner of the device allows for an easy construction of a route, as reviews say. This device may carry out wireless info transfers with other Garmin GPS units. Display on the device has been rated to be magnificent as well.
Most helpful customer reviews 51 of 54 people found the following review helpful. The traffic update is great. I usually use my iPhone to check traffic condition before I drive home or go to work. With this, it tell me if there’s traffic with advance voice warning and red lane indicator. So that’s what I could think of so far after one day of usage. I haven’t used the call feature to Bing or other services. (It uses your phone via bluetooth to make a call to a 408 area code number to check on everything (weather, point of interest, stocks, etc.) So it’s not a 3G or edge network subscription. The traffic update, however, doesn’t require your phone. For a fraction of the cost of an in-dash OEM GPS navigation unit, I’d strongly recommend getting this unit (the lifetime traffic update is a dream come true.) The only thing missing now is a speed radar built-in. They could make a receiver unit in the cradle and the software in the GPS unit. So when driving it will you know if there’s a police with a radar gun ahead. Oh btw, this one tells you if there’s photo radar enforcement ahead too. It really packs a lot of feature in there with a reasonable price tag. ***Update*** 2. A good feature: I drove with this GPS unit on but without a destination entered. It is still doing it’s job even without a destination: a. still warning you of any photo radar spots, b. still has active bluetooth sync to your phone. c. still shows traffic data; d. still shows your driving speed if you are over the speed limit. Still a recommended buy. 42 of 47 people found the following review helpful. After charging the unit up and proceeding through the basic setup, which is very straight forward, I tested out the devices features. This is a feature rich GPS. Setting up the bluetooth and syncing my phones contacts was a snap (although the syncing part took several minutes). The voice prompts were clear and the voice recognition was both effective and convenient. I was able to retrieve contacts and dial them without ever touching the device. The sound quality of the speaker phone was good, but not great, for both sender and receiver. I didn’t get a chance to really check out the noise canceling feature of the hands free operation, but more on that later. Finding gas prices and getting a stock quote was cool and easy. Just keep in mind that it needs a connection to your phone to do this. I was jazzed about this GPS and it’s many capabilities. My mind was thinking of ways to make the most of its features. So I decided to take it for a real test drive, so to speak, and that is where the infatuation fell apart. When I mounted the GPS on it’s car charging cradle, it quit speaking and responding to voice commands. So I removed it from the cradle and it resumed listening and speaking. Tried it again with the same result. I unplugged the power, tried a reset, checked the settings…still wouldn’t talk to or listen to me when it was in the charging cradle. Next, I visited the Motorola Motonav website and downloaded and installed the software required for updating the GPS. The software is easy to install and use and it informed me that there were three updates available for the device and it’s maps. Thinking this would solve my problems, I updated the device (and made backups for the GPS – a cool feature of the program). Yet, the issue persisted so I gave in to calling the Motonav support number. The helpful person on the other end sent me an RMA via email. Therein lies my issues with customer support. First, the RMA did not include a shipping label. I would need to pay for shipping a brand new item back for service. Second, I would need to send proof of purchase – which was not included with this product because it was sent to me by Motorola to try out and review (with a very nice letter from the Motonav team I might add) via the Amazon Vine program. When I contacted customer service about the issue the response was simple, I pay to ship it back and they may or may not fix it since I do not have proof of purchase. In their words, “that will be up to the service department.” Hmmm. I guess I’ll be sticking to my Garmin. At least it still speaks to me and I won’t have to deal with all of my rejection issues, but that is another story. 25 of 27 people found the following review helpful. One of the unique features is that the unit can pair with a Bluetooth phone, enabling the GPS to access various information services such as live traffic, search (Google and Bing) and added services like stock quotes, weather, flight status, messaging and even up-to-the-minute fuel prices. You can also use the GPS as a “front end” to your phone, letting you place calls and so on directly from the GPS. For those of you having small, conventional (but Bluetooth-enabled) phones, this is a big plus while driving as you can use the big LCD screen on the GPS to work your phone, and it gives you hands-free capabilities. Being Bluetooth, there are no wires or anything. If left on, the GPS will pair with your phone and periodically make calls to keep its information in sync. On a typical day, this seems to add up to about five minutes worth of airtime…not sure how I feel about that, given that I might be paying for the calls. Since I have wireless broadband and a data plan, I’d probably prefer if there was a way to use either an 802.11 or 3G connection, rather than dialing what to me are long distance calls to get this information. The traffic information seems reliable, and it doesn’t require an additional subscription (the unit in my car requires an XM subscription in order to receive traffic data). Still, I question how accurate it is, and coverage is far from universal. This isn’t a gripe about the Motonav – just seems to be the nature of the beast at this point in time. To its credit, the Motonav does support automatic redirection around congested areas, so if you drive into an area known to have traffic, the unit will automatically pick the least congested route for you. The Motonav has a very good database of Points of Interest, making it easy to find many of the nearby locations I might want to search for. When entering destinations, it also supports voice navigation and direct entry using the touch screen. I found the voice navigation fairly good, so long as there’s not a lot of ambient noise. The touch screen works fairly well since the screen itself is large, but of course, with lengthy searches, it can be annoying – I much prefer the voice recognition. A nice touch is that once you find your destination, the phone number is shown right on the display. At the moment, I happen to have access to four completely different GPS devices: the built-in unit in my car, the GPS that comes with my Droid phone (mostly based on Google Maps), a Garmin Nuvi and now the Motonav. This made it easy to compare the features and capabilities of each. One difference is the startup time. The unit in my car seems always ready and the Droid is nearly always-on as well. The Motonav, on the other hand, seems to take about a minute to acquire enough GPS satellites to be useful. I’d have to say that the large display in my car was the most readable, but the Motonav isn’t far behind. The Droid screen seems “sexier” somehow, but it’s just small enough that I need to have it right in front of my face for it to be truly readable, where I can see the Motonav from several feet away. Accuracy seemed about the same across these three units. The Motonav offered better guidance in my opinion, warning me ahead of time for upcoming turns in a way that seemed to be more understandable. I also found the Motonav to be a bit more accurate in terms of ETA and other time calculations. Compared to the Garmin, I’d have to say that the Motonav is more up to date in terms of features thanks to it’s more sophisticated software and Bluetooth connection. I was surprised to see the screen compared to my Motorola Droid phone. My phone uses a very sleek and glossy mineral glass that I’ve come to really love. It’s very vibrant and although small, displays a wonderful range of colors and high contrast images. By comparison, the Motonav screen isn’t at all glossy, Motorola opting instead for a matte finish that probably works out to be a bit easier to read in direct sunlight. The images aren’t nearly as impressive – but I suppose they don’t need to be…all the basics are there, and maps and so forth are certainly legible – it just surprises me how different the technology is versus what Motorola is using in phones today. Not necessarily “worse”, just “different”. Only thing I really find to complain about is the location of the buttons on the Motonav. If you use it handheld, it’s hard to pick up the unit and not hit one of the buttons on the back of the unit. It’s possible to lock out these buttons, but in the beginning, you’ll probably be inadvertently adjusting the volume up or down quite a bit. Of course, mounted in the car, this isn’t a problem. Overall, I found the unit to be easy and intuitive to operate and to work about as well as anything else out there. If you need a GPS, this would be one of my top choices…definitely recommended. |
Very nice, very nice, Indeed!
Feature rich GPS but customer support? Well, not so feature rich.
